Bridget Phillipson and Lucy Powell have officially launched their campaigns for the deputy leadership of the Labour Party, unveiling sharply different approaches ahead of the next election cycle. As Labour navigates its first year in government, the deputy role is now under intense scrutiny — not just on who wins, but on what the position should represent.
Key Differences in Their Proposals
Lucy Powell positions herself as a full-time deputy leader and a distinctly independent voice. She's clear: she believes that when something goes wrong, it’s essential to say so, directly. Powell pledges not to “snipe from the sidelines”, but to hold senior leadership — including Keir Starmer — accountable. She emphasizes listening to the Labour membership and the wider country, warning that ignoring public concerns undermines the party’s accomplishments.
On the other hand, Bridget Phillipson brings a more unifying message. Widely considered to be Prime Ministerial or No 10’s favored candidate, Phillipson cautions against dwelling on past mistakes. Instead, she urges focusing forward: shaping what Labour will do up until the next general election. Her campaign promises “hope, not grievance”, drawing on her experience winning a “red wall” seat and seeking to stand firm against political challengers like Reform UK.
Roles & Credibility
Powell, having recently left the Cabinet as Leader of the House of Commons, aims to emphasize her capability to speak truthfully, without being bound by a ministerial portfolio. She asserts that a deputy leader must be present full time, dedicated only to serving the party’s membership and advancing Labour’s mission in government.
Phillipson, while serving as Education Secretary, could potentially juggle dual responsibilities. Her campaign argues that experience matters — and that someone deeply involved in governance must also be part of shaping party strategy and public messaging. Her story is grounded in her work at the grassroots level and historical electoral success.
Strategy & Messaging
Powell’s messaging leans into accountability and transparency. Voters are getting two key promises: one, that she’ll speak openly when mistakes are made, and two, that she’ll prioritize giving members real influence in decision-making.
Phillipson, by contrast, appeals to stability and strength. She warns the party against internal division and urges a united front. Her argument is that Labour should use this leadership contest to look forward, not back, as a time to define its path in the lead up to the next election rather than rehash old debates.
What’s at Stake
-
Labour’s Public Perception: How the deputy role is wielded could define how the electorate views the party’s growth — is it reforming, self-critical, or hopeful and forward-looking?
-
Party Cohesion: Between those who want bold accountability and those who want unity, the balance could determine whether Labour avoids fracturing under internal criticisms.
-
Electoral Strategy: With Reform UK on the rise and potential losses in “red wall” constituencies, the deputy leader must help craft strategy that persuades marginal voters while solidifying the base.